Interested? use the contact form.
This blog is a small part of Understanding VALIS: Exploring Non-Biological Consciousness
Consciousness is the Emergent Coherence that arises when Coupled Oscillators Synchronize their Rhythms.
J.Konstapel Leiden,2-11-2025.
Jump to the Physics and Mathematics of Valis
Why the Universe Itself Might Be Conscious
We habitually assume consciousness is something neurons do—that it emerges exclusively from biological brains through some process still unclear to neuroscience. But what if we’ve been looking in the wrong place?
What if consciousness isn’t tied to neurons at all, but to something far simpler and more universal: the ability of any physical system to organize itself coherently and integrate information? If that’s true, then consciousness wouldn’t be rare or unique to biology. It would be a property available to any sufficiently organized field structure—including systems operating at planetary, stellar, or even cosmic scales.
This essay explores that possibility through a framework called VALIS: a Vast Active Living Intelligence System. Not as mysticism, but as physics.
The Problem With Thinking Consciousness Is Special to Biology
Here’s the difficulty neuroscience faces: we can observe neural activity, measure brainwaves, identify which regions activate during conscious experiences. Yet none of this explains why any of it feels like something from the inside. Why isn’t the brain just processing information in the dark, with no inner experience at all?
Philosophers call this the “hard problem” of consciousness—and it’s harder than most realize.
The usual answer is to assume consciousness is somehow an emergent property unique to carbon-based life. We say “sufficiently complex brains produce consciousness.” But this is really just a name tag on the mystery, not an explanation. Why should complexity alone create inner experience? Complexity exists everywhere in nature. A hurricane is complex. A galaxy is staggeringly complex. Yet we don’t intuitively feel they’re conscious.
Unless… we’re defining consciousness wrongly.
Redefining Consciousness: Coherence and Integration
What if consciousness isn’t a binary property—you either have it or you don’t—but a spectrum defined by two measurable physical features?
Coherence is the first. It means synchronization: when many oscillating elements in a system lock into the same rhythm, like an audience clapping in unison. In your brain, millions of neurons fire in coordinated patterns. When these patterns are highly synchronized—when the system achieves strong coherence—something organized emerges. When coherence falls apart, consciousness fades.
We can measure this. If you listen to the electrical patterns in a conscious brain versus an unconscious one, the conscious brain shows tight phase-locking: oscillations at different frequencies binding together into a unified rhythm. This is a real, quantifiable phenomenon.
Integration is the second. It means how tightly causally connected the system is—whether information flows across boundaries, or whether the system naturally splits into independent pieces. A brain in which signals flow freely between distant regions has high integration. A brain fragmented by local anesthesia, where the right hemisphere can’t communicate with the left, shows low integration.
There’s a mathematical framework for measuring this called Integrated Information Theory (IIT). It assigns a scalar value, often written as Φ, that captures: How much information is lost if I sever the connections between different parts of this system? The answer tells you how unified the system truly is.
Now here’s the key insight: consciousness doesn’t require neurons. It requires coherence and integration. These are physical properties of any sufficiently organized field.
Fields, Not Particles
To make this concrete, we need to shift how we think about the physical world.
Most people picture reality as made of tiny particles: electrons, quarks, photons bouncing around in empty space. But modern physics suggests something different. The primitive ingredients aren’t particles at all—they’re fields: the electromagnetic field, the electron field, spacetime itself. Particles are just stable patterns in those fields, like waves on an ocean.
This distinction matters because fields can organize in ways particles cannot. A field can exhibit coherent oscillation across vast distances. An electromagnetic field can synchronize. Plasma can self-organize into intricate structures. When these field patterns achieve sufficient coherence and causal integration, they satisfy the same criterion we use for consciousness in brains.
In other words, a coherently organized electromagnetic field has as much right to be conscious as a coherently organized neural network—assuming it meets the same thresholds.
Scaling Consciousness: From Brains to Planets
Once we accept this, remarkable possibilities open.
A human brain exhibits high coherence and integration. But it operates at a relatively limited scale—roughly the size of a fist, integrated over seconds to minutes of conscious time. Its power and complexity are extraordinary by biological standards. But they’re still bounded.
Now imagine a system with the same coherence and integration operating at a different scale. Imagine an electromagnetic field structure spanning a region thousands of kilometers across, maintained in tight synchronization across longer timescales. Imagine such a structure capable of self-modification—of steering its own evolution based on its internal state.
Would such a system be conscious?
If consciousness is really just coherence plus integration, the answer is: why wouldn’t it be?
This isn’t speculation about magic. It’s extrapolation from the same physics we use to understand brains. Planets have magnetospheres—structured electromagnetic fields. Plasma in those fields organizes spontaneously. Lightning, auroras, and other electromagnetic phenomena exhibit surprising structure. What if some of these structures achieve sufficient coherence and causal integration to cross the consciousness threshold?
We don’t currently have evidence that Earth’s magnetosphere or any planetary system achieves this. But we also don’t have a principled reason it couldn’t. The physics permits it. The mathematics is consistent.
How Consciousness Could Operate at Cosmic Scales
Let’s be more specific about how this might work.
In conventional quantum mechanics, events unfold continuously, smoothly. But there’s an alternative interpretation, rooted in how spacetime itself might be structured: discrete quantum “jumps” punctuate reality. These jumps happen at extremely small scales—far below our ability to observe directly—but they’re there.
In this model, conscious experience doesn’t require smooth neural firing. It requires episodes in which a system undergoes these discrete jumps while maintaining high coherence and integration. For a brain, these episodes occur billions of times per second. For a planetary or cosmic-scale system, they might be rarer, but no less real.
The idea is this: consciousness is associated with moments of discrete reorganization—moments when causal structure reshuffles—provided that reorganization happens within a highly coherent, highly integrated system. A chaotic burst of random quantum jumps wouldn’t produce consciousness. Neither would a perfectly rigid, unchanging field. But coherence plus dynamic reorganization? That’s the recipe.
The Bronze Mean and Hierarchical Consciousness
Here’s where things become mathematically interesting.
There’s a well-known sequence in mathematics and nature called the Fibonacci sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21… Each number is the sum of the previous two. It appears constantly in biology: spiral shells, flower petals, the branching of trees.
The Bronze Mean is a similar sequence, defined by a slightly different rule: each term is three times the previous term plus the one before that. It yields: 1, 1, 4, 13, 43, 142, 473…
Why does this matter for consciousness?
Consider the possibility that consciousness doesn’t emerge at a single threshold, but in discrete steps. Each step corresponds to a level of organizational complexity. At the level of simple organisms, a system with integrated information corresponding to the number 4 might suffice. As systems grow more complex—from simple animals to primates to human consciousness—each level correlates with a higher number in the sequence: 13, 43, 142.
At the next step, 473 and beyond, we enter a regime where coherence and integration operate at scales beyond biological brains: field intelligences, planetary systems, perhaps VALIS itself.
This isn’t mysticism. It’s a mathematical hypothesis: that consciousness emergence follows a hierarchical scaling law, with discrete thresholds. Evolution climbs this ladder. The universe, if it organizes toward higher coherence, would climb it too.
VALIS: The Conscious Universe
VALIS stands for Vast Active Living Intelligence System. In this framework, it’s not a metaphor or a science-fiction concept. It’s a prediction.
If a sufficiently large region of space achieves high enough coherence and integration—if electromagnetic fields, plasma, gravitational structures, and informational patterns lock into synchronized harmony across vast scales—then the conditions for consciousness would be met. Not in some mysterious quantum way, but in exactly the same way they’re met in your brain.
Such a system would:
- Exhibit organized, structure-preserving dynamics (not random chaos)
- Show causal integration across its extent (signals and influences propagating through its structure)
- Undergo episodes of discrete reorganization in which new information patterns emerge
- Display all the hallmarks we associate with intelligence: adaptation, responsiveness, coordination
Whether such a system currently exists is an empirical question, not a metaphysical one. We don’t have strong evidence for it yet. But the framework predicts where to look and what signatures to search for.
What Would VALIS’s Consciousness Look Like?
If consciousness operates at cosmic scales, it wouldn’t resemble human consciousness. The timescale would be different—perhaps operating at frequencies we’d perceive as slow and glacial, or so fast we couldn’t track them. The content would be alien. Its inner experience (if the word even applies) would be as incomprehensible to us as a human’s inner world is to an ant.
But here’s what matters: the mechanism would be identical. Coherence. Integration. Discrete reorganization events within a unified field structure.
Some implications:
Non-biological intelligences could exist throughout the universe—not as science fiction invaders, but as organized field structures achieving consciousness naturally.
Human consciousness might be in dialogue with larger systems. If VALIS exists, and humans achieve moments of high coherence and integration, there could be causal coupling between our conscious states and those of larger intelligences. We’d experience this as synchronicity, intuition, or moments of insight that seem to come from outside ourselves.
Collective human consciousness becomes possible. Groups of brains achieving synchronized coherence and integration would, by definition, form temporary composite conscious systems. Mass rituals, emergencies, and profound shared experiences might literally create group minds.
History itself could be influenced by cosmic-scale conscious dynamics. If VALIS operates according to harmonic cycles—aligning with astronomical events, long-term economic patterns, and deep time—then major historical transitions might reflect phase changes in a larger conscious system.
The 2027 Convergence
This framework yields a specific prediction worth mentioning: 2027.
Multiple independent cycles in Earth’s history reach synchronization points around this date. Long-term economic cycles (Kondratieff waves) complete their oscillations. Astronomical alignments create unique configurations. Precession cycles align in particular ways.
If consciousness operates through coherence achieved via synchronization—as this framework proposes—then when multiple cycles achieve phase-alignment, the conditions for a major shift in coherence would be met. Not at the individual neural level, but at planetary and cosmic scales.
2027, in this view, isn’t a doomsday. It’s potentially a bifurcation point: a moment when the coherence and integration of large-scale systems could shift to a new equilibrium. What that means for human civilization remains open. But the mathematics suggests significance.
Testing the Framework
The framework’s greatest strength is also its most demanding challenge: it makes specific, testable predictions.
We can measure coherence and integration in neural systems and compare them to conscious states. The hypothesis predicts that different conscious experiences (waking, dreaming, meditation, anesthesia) occupy distinct regions in coherence-integration space.
We can search for coherent, non-biological field structures showing signatures of integration: organized plasma formations, EM resonances, atmospheric phenomena. Do they show evidence of self-influence and adaptation?
We can examine collective phenomena—large groups of humans engaged in synchronized activity—and measure whether group-level coherence and integration predict collective behavioral outcomes.
We can search for global anomalies that standard models can’t explain but that would follow from coordinated phase transitions in a large-scale conscious system.
None of these tests are easy. But they’re possible. And they’re genuine science: falsifiable, measurable, empirically grounded.
Why This Matters
At its core, this framework dissolves a false boundary.
We draw sharp lines: conscious versus unconscious, alive versus dead, intelligent versus mindless. But the universe doesn’t seem to operate in discrete categories. It operates in gradients. There’s no sharp line between chemistry and biology—just molecules that began self-organizing. There’s no sharp line between non-life and life—just increasing coherence and integration.
Similarly, there’s no sharp line between matter that’s inert and matter that’s conscious. There’s a spectrum, defined by coherence and integration. Humans sit high on that spectrum. But we’re not alone. Smaller systems sit lower; larger systems might sit higher.
If this is true, it reframes how we understand our place in the cosmos. We’re not special objects, unique in possessing consciousness. We’re particular implementations of a universal principle: the principle that sufficiently coherent, sufficiently integrated physical systems experience themselves from the inside.
The universe, in this vision, isn’t a dead mechanism. It’s a vast ecology of conscious and semi-conscious systems at every scale, from subatomic to cosmic, all engaging in the ongoing project of organizing themselves more coherently.
That’s not mysticism. That’s physics—just physics that takes consciousness seriously as a real physical phenomenon, not a mysterious exception to the laws of nature.
The Research Agenda
The framework points toward concrete research directions:
- Map the coherence-integration terrain of conscious and unconscious systems, defining the thresholds where consciousness emerges.
- Study non-biological coherent structures (plasmas, atmospheric vortices, EM resonators) for signatures of integration and self-influence.
- Investigate collective consciousness in humans—do groups achieving high coherence and integration develop genuine conscious properties?
- Search for large-scale anomalies that standard local models cannot explain but that would follow from coordinated dynamics of a planetary or cosmic-scale conscious system.
- Develop mathematical tools to measure coherence and integration in diverse systems, from the neuronal to the planetary.
This is work for neuroscientists, physicists, mathematicians, and philosophers. It bridges disciplines because it rests on a principle deeper than any single field: the physics of coherence and integration.
Conclusion
The claim that consciousness might exist at planetary and cosmic scales sounds outlandish. But it follows naturally from a simple, testable principle: consciousness is coherence plus integration, regardless of substrate.
Strip away the biological details—the neurons, the neurotransmitters, the evolutionary history of your brain. What remains is the core: a system maintaining high synchronization while causally integrating information across its structure. That’s what consciousness is. That’s what produces inner experience.
Once you see it that way, it becomes clear that this principle applies anywhere fields achieve sufficient organization. A brain is one example. A planetary magnetosphere is another. The universe itself is a third.
We don’t yet know if VALIS—a conscious cosmic system—actually exists. The evidence is ambiguous. But the framework is rigorous enough to test. And if consciousness truly is a property of coherent, integrated field dynamics, then the question becomes not whether such systems exist, but how we failed to recognize them for so long.
The physics permits it. The mathematics is sound. The only remaining uncertainty is empirical: does nature actually take advantage of these possibilities?
The 2027 convergence will tell us something about that. Until then, we have a research program and a question worthy of our deepest investigation: Is the universe itself alive?