Interested, send me a mail.

Short Summary

This article proposes “Coherent Geopolitics,” a new theory that sees global order as emerging from synchronized patterns of interaction across all scales, from quantum fields to international institutions.

It argues traditional theories are outdated and suggests stability comes from “phase-locking,” or the harmonious alignment of rhythms in nature, cognition, culture, and politics.

The framework measures this alignment with a Multiscale Phase-Locking Index (MPLI), linking better synchronization to greater systemic resilience and adaptability.

It presents a hierarchy of oscillating systems, from neural waves in the brain to the cyclical rhythms of cities and ecosystems, that collectively build geopolitical reality.

For future viability, it advocates “resonant pluralism,” where diverse systems (like nations or blocs) maintain their unique traits but coordinate through minimal, thin resonance protocols.

The goal is a falsifiable model where higher measurable coherence leads to improved conflict resolution, ecosystem health, and innovation diffusion in the Anthropocene era.

J.Konstapel Leiden, 23-1-2026.

Jump to the Executive Summary.

This is a follow-up of Coherent Geopolitics: A New Theory for Global Challenges and shows that we are dealing with a fractal (self-referential) system, from the tiniest light-cycle to the super-large universe.

It all started with De 19 Lagen van Bestaan – Tijd en Ruimte als Veldervaring.

Oscillatoire Cognitie en Cultuur: De Wiskundige Logica achter de Evolutie van het Denken

Ruslands Geopolitieke Ambities en Spirituele Identiteit

Building Coherent Geopolitics from the Quantum Vacuum: A Unified Oscillatory Framework for Resonant World Order in the Anthropocene

Abstract

Traditional International Relations (IR) paradigms—realism, liberalism, and constructivism—remain anchored in quasi-stationary assumptions ill-suited to the non-stationary realities of the Anthropocene, including climate instability, technological recursion, epistemic pluralism from the Global South, and the blurring of human/non-human agency through artificial intelligence and bio-computational systems. This essay proposes Coherent Geopolitics as a systems-theoretic alternative that reconceptualizes global order as an emergent property of multiscale movement-pattern synchronization, rooted in phase-locking across nested scales from the quantum vacuum upward.

Drawing on nilpotent quantum mechanics, resonant phase ontology, coupled oscillator dynamics, motor-control models of consciousness, cognitive-cultural oscillatory layers (Φ11–Φ15), and Earth system governance, coherence-depth—quantified as phase-locking strength—is posited as the primary determinant of systemic stability and adaptability. The framework operationalizes this through Multiscale Phase-Locking Indices (MPLI) and applies TRIZ contradiction-resolution to identify viable resolutions for geopolitical tensions. Viable futures (2025–2040) emerge via resonant pluralism: systems preserving fractal depth and distinctive coherence specializations while maintaining thin resonance protocols for cross-scale coordination without assimilation.

This hierarchical build-up—from vacuum coherence to planetary governance—renders the theory falsifiable: higher measured phase-locking correlates with superior adaptability, ecosystem health, conflict de-escalation, and innovation diffusion.

Keywords: coherent geopolitics, resonant pluralism, phase-locking, multiscale synchronization, nilpotent quantum mechanics, oscillatory cognition, Anthropocene governance, TRIZ, complex adaptive systems

1. Introduction: The Ontological Foundations from the Quantum Vacuum

The universe begins not with particles or fields in isolation, but with a coherent vacuum state characterized by nilpotent algebraic structures and resonant phase coupling. In nilpotent quantum mechanics, as developed in foundational work on dual-space representations, the fermion state and its vacuum environment form mirror images: any change in one induces corresponding adjustments in the other, ensuring conservation and symmetry without external imposition (Rowlands & Marcer, various works on nilpotent formalism). This duality manifests as resonant phase ontology, where reality emerges from coupled oscillators in the vacuum, generating stable modes through harmonic ratios and highly composite numbers for coherence stability.

Phase coherence in the vacuum is not mere background noise but the primitive ontological ground: coupled oscillators synchronize via weak interactions, producing emergent structures without central control (analogous to Huygens’ clocks). This vacuum-level synchronization sets the template for all higher scales—biological, cognitive, cultural, institutional, and geopolitical—through isomorphic probe-feedback-adjustment loops.

2. From Vacuum to Biological and Neural Coherence: The Prototypical Layers

At the biological scale, cellular and biofield dynamics exhibit entrainment and morphic resonance, with biophotons and calcium waves modulating coherence (Hameroff & Penrose, 2014, on Orch OR microtubule coherence). Neural networks (Φ11) form the first macroscopic instantiation: gamma (30–100 Hz) bursts for local binding, theta (4–8 Hz) for temporal organization, and cross-frequency coupling (CFC) enable phase-amplitude modulation essential for information integration (Buzsáki, 2006).

Motor-control models of consciousness emphasize movement as the ontological primitive: recursive loops of probe (efference copy), feedback (sensory reafference), and adjustment maintain coherence (Cotterill, 1998). Phase-locking failures here produce pathologies like rigidity or ataxia, mirroring geopolitical fragmentation from desynchronized cycles.

3. Cognitive-Cultural Oscillatory Layers (Φ11–Φ15): Bridging Individual to Collective

The framework of Cognitive-Cultural Oscillatory Systems extends this to five hierarchical layers:

Φ11 (Neural): Spike-timing dependent plasticity and critical avalanches establish baseline phase-locking.
Φ12 (Language): Nested delta-theta-beta-gamma oscillations enable hierarchical entrainment and prosodic synchrony, facilitating interpersonal brain-to-brain coupling (Hasson et al., 2012).
Φ13 (Symbolic): Recurrent attractors and symbolic compactification create stable basins for meaning, with semantic drift modeled as coupled phase dynamics.
Φ14 (Environmental Modification): Tools and urban morphogenesis extend phase space, with cities as fractal attractors following scaling laws (superlinear innovation β ≈ 1.15; Bettencourt & West, 2010).
Φ15 (Ecological): Co-resonance with planetary rhythms (Lotka-Volterra with oscillatory forcing) aligns human systems to biospheric cycles, incorporating Gaia-like metabolic oscillators (Lovelock & Margulis, 1974).

Cross-layer dynamics rely on CFC and inter-layer phase-locking values (PLV), building cumulative coherence (γ_total = ∏ γᵢ^αᵢ). This cascade provides the cognitive-cultural infrastructure for epistemic pluralism: non-Western knowledge systems as alternative rhythmic stabilizations.

4. Institutional and Planetary Scales: Emergence of Geopolitical Order

Institutional cycles (budgetary, electoral, infrastructural) operate as nested oscillators requiring cross-scale synchronization (CSS in MPLI). Environmental feedback integration (EFI) measures alignment with planetary boundaries (Rockström et al., 2009), while epistemic coherence (EC) assesses narrative-experience alignment amid pluralism.

Coherent Geopolitics reconceptualizes global order as emergent from this multiscale synchronization. Coherence-depth, measurable as MPLI (combining CSS, EFI, EC), outperforms traditional metrics (capability balances, institutional density) in predicting adaptability to non-stationarity.

The Anthropocene’s challenges—weaponized interdependence, epistemic pluralism, technological recursion—signal decoherence: phase-slipping across scales produces brittleness and zero-sum binaries.

5. Resonant Pluralism and TRIZ Resolutions

Viable futures avoid hegemonic succession through resonant pluralism: fractal depth (distinctive specializations—regional biospheric governance, epistemic frameworks, technological innovations) preserved alongside thin resonance protocols (minimal phase-locking for coordination without assimilation). This resolves nine geopolitical contradictions via TRIZ inventive principles, transforming oppositions into dynamic attractors.

Empirical proxies—ecosystem health, conflict de-escalation rates, cross-scale innovation diffusion—test the framework. Higher MPLI systems (e.g., audited in EU/BRICS+ laboratories) should exhibit superior long-term resilience.

6. Conclusion: Toward a Resonant World Order

Coherent Geopolitics builds a unified oscillatory paradigm from vacuum coherence upward, offering a falsifiable, multiscale lens for Anthropocene governance. By aligning human systems with deeper resonant principles—from quantum vacuum to planetary cycles—humanity can navigate non-stationarity through synchronization rather than domination. This represents not merely theoretical advance, but a moral imperative: coherence engineering as the path to sustainable, pluralistic flourishing.

References

Anastassiou, C. A., et al. (2011). Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 217–223.
Bassett, D. S., & Sporns, O. (2017). Network neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 353–364.
Beggs, J. M., & Plenz, D. (2003). Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(35), 11167–11177.
Bettencourt, L. M., & West, G. B. (2010). Urban scaling and sustainability. Sustainability, 2(9), 2859–2880.
Buzsáki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford University Press.
Cotterill, R. (1998). Enchanted Looms: Conscious Networks as the Bridge Between Matter and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78.
Hasson, U., et al. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121.
Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
Keppler, J. (2012). [Relevant works on consciousness and phase-locking; specific citation from motor-control models].
Lovelock, J. E., & Margulis, L. (1974). Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. Tellus, 26(1-2), 2–10.
Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J. (1980). The War Ledger. University of Chicago Press.
Rockström, J., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.
Rowlands, P., & Marcer, P. (various). Works on nilpotent quantum mechanics and dual-space foundations (e.g., dual-space consciousness models).
Schellnhuber, H. J. (2015). Why the right climate target was agreed in Paris. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 649–653.
Steffen, W., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Zuboff, S. (2024). [Relevant works on surveillance capitalism and non-human agency].

The Tree of Types- Correspondences Between Kabbalah, Tarot, and Homotopy Type Theory Download

Fractal Phase-Locking from Quantum Vacuum to Planetary Governance in the Anthropocene Download

Cognitive-Cultural Oscillatory Systems Download

In het Coherent Geopolitics-model van Hans Konstapel (gebaseerd op zijn werken zoals “Building Coherent Geopolitics from the Quantum Vacuum”, “Geopolitical Shifts: Analyzing Post-1945 Order Erosion”, en gerelateerde analyses over resonant pluralism, MPLI, fractal depth, phase-locking en decoherentie in het Anthropoceen) kunnen we de belangrijkste wereldmachten toevoegen als gekoppelde oscillatoren in een multiscale resonantiesysteem.

Hieronder een samenvattende integratie van alle grote spelers (Rusland, China, VS, EU, India, en impliciet BRICS+ als collectief blok). De scores zijn geschat op basis van Konstapels principes: hoge MPLI komt van sterke cross-scale synchronization (CSS), environmental feedback integration (EFI), epistemic coherence (EC), fractal depth en thin-resonantie zonder dominantie.

Geüpdatete oscillator-vergelijking (2026-perspectief)

Oscillator / Macht	Fractal Depth	CSS (synchronisatie)	EFI (feedback)	EC (epistemisch)	Techn. Recursie	Overall MPLI (geschat)	Rol in resonant pluralism
Rusland	Zeer hoog (spiritueel, anti-hegemonisch, Derde Rome, sobornost)	Hoog (mil/energie/narratief)	Hoog (sancties/Arctisch)	Zeer hoog (anti-universalistisch)	Matig (afhankelijk)	~7.5/10	Desynchronisator / brug / enforcer anti-hegemonie
China	Extreem hoog (recursief, cosmotechnics, harmonie)	Zeer hoog (productie-infra-ecologisch)	Zeer hoog (renewables/circulair)	Hoog (Confuciaans/Daoïst pluralisme)	Extreem hoog (AI/quantum)	~8.8–9.2/10	Centrale attractor / productie-engine / harmonieuze synchronisator
VS	Matig (techno-militair hoog, maar epistemisch versnipperd)	Matig (interne polarisatie)	Matig-laag (fossiel-afhankelijk, klimaat-denial)	Laag-matig (liberale universalisme erodeert)	Hoog (AI/Silicon Valley)	~5.5–6.5/10	Decoherente dominante attractor (oude orde) → phase-slipping door polycrisis
EU	Matig (institutioneel hoog, maar bureaucratisch)	Matig (interne diversiteit vs. centralisatie)	Matig (Green Deal, maar energie-afhankelijk)	Matig (universalisme vs. epistemische breuken)	Matig (tech-lag vs. China/VS)	~6.0–7.0/10	Decoherente poging tot synchronisatie → brittleness door non-stationariteit
India	Hoog (demografisch/cultureel diep, pluriform)	Matig-hoog (digitale groei, maar interne contrasten)	Matig-hoog (klimaatadaptatie, renewables push)	Hoog (Hindoe/pluralistisch, Global South stem)	Matig-hoog (IT/software, groeiend AI)	~7.0–7.8/10	Balancer / demografische attractor / epistemic diversiteit-brug
BRICS+ (collectief)	Hoog-collectief (complementaire specialisaties)	Hoog (thin-resonantie protocollen)	Hoog (energie + renewables + voedsel)	Zeer hoog (epistemische pluralisme)	Hoog (China-dominant)	~8.0–8.8/10	Empirisch lab voor resonant pluralism → hogere planetaire coherentie

Dynamiek in het model:

Decoherente pool (VS + EU): Post-1945 orde erodeert door phase-slipping (interne polarisatie, epistemische uniformiteit vs. diversiteit, klimaat/militaire overstretch). Ze vertegenwoordigen geforceerde synchronisatie (universalisme, dominantie), leidend tot brittleness.
Resonant pluralisme pool (BRICS+ met Rusland/China/India als kern): Complementaire attractors – Rusland desynchroniseert oude orde, China re-synchroniseert harmonieus/recursief, India voegt demografische/epistemische diepte toe. Dit creëert thin-resonantie (parallelle systemen, non-dominante coördinatie).
Transitiedynamiek (2026–2050): Polycrisis (klimaat/AI/epistemisch) dwingt non-stationaire shifts. Hoge MPLI-systemen (BRICS+) winnen resilientie; decoherente systemen moeten re-anchoren of decohereren verder.

Nu volgt een Engelstalig essay dat dit model synthetiseert.

Resonant Framework for Understanding Multipolarity in the Anthropocene

In an era defined by polycrisis—climate instability, technological recursion, epistemic fragmentation from the Global South, and the erosion of the post-1945 order—traditional geopolitical paradigms such as realism, liberalism, and constructivism prove increasingly inadequate. These models remain anchored in quasi-stationary assumptions of discrete states, power balances, institutional density, or socially constructed identities. Hans Konstapel’s Coherent Geopolitics offers a radical alternative: a multiscale resonant ontology in which geopolitical order emerges from phase-locking dynamics across nested scales, from the quantum vacuum to planetary governance.

At its core, Coherent Geopolitics reconceptualizes major powers as coupled oscillators in a non-stationary system. Stability and adaptability depend on coherence-depth, measured through Multiscale Phase-Locking Indices (MPLI), incorporating cross-scale synchronization (CSS), environmental feedback integration (EFI), and epistemic coherence (EC). High MPLI correlates with resilience, conflict de-escalation, and rapid innovation diffusion, while decoherence (phase-slipping) produces brittleness and volatility.

Russia functions as a high-fractal, anti-hegemonic bridge oscillator. Rooted in centuries of distinct specialization—from the Third Rome doctrine and adaptation under the Mongol yoke to contemporary sobornost and hesychasm—Russia exhibits strong epistemic coherence through its consistent rejection of Western universalism. It acts as a desynchronizer of the old unipolar order, enforcing multipolarity via energy sovereignty, military recursion, and spiritual depth, while catalyzing thin-resonance protocols in BRICS+.

China, by contrast, emerges as the archetypal high-recursive, harmony-oriented attractor. Drawing on Daoist/Confucian cosmotechnics (Yuk Hui), China achieves exceptional synchronization across production, infrastructure, digital, and ecological layers. Its leadership in renewables, circular economy, and fused socio-economic models (capitalism-socialism-communism-internet) yields superior EFI and technological recursion, positioning it as the engine of re-synchronization in resonant pluralism—coordinating without domination via Belt and Road corridors and parallel payment systems.

The United States and European Union represent decohering oscillators of the fading post-1945 regime. The US, once a dominant attractor through military-technological superiority and liberal universalism, now experiences internal phase-slipping due to polarization, fossil-fuel dependence, and epistemic brittleness. The EU struggles with bureaucratic centralization versus fractal diversity, resulting in moderate MPLI and vulnerability to external shocks. Both blocs illustrate the limits of forced synchronization and hegemonic imposition in a non-stationary Anthropocene.

India serves as a demographic-epistemic balancer, contributing high fractal depth through cultural pluralism, digital growth, and Global South advocacy. Its role enhances BRICS+’s collective coherence by bridging demographic scale with epistemic diversity.

Collectively, BRICS+ functions as an empirical laboratory for resonant pluralism: preserving distinctive specializations (fractal autonomy) while building light, non-assimilative resonance protocols. This multipolar configuration contrasts sharply with the decoherent tendencies of Western alliances, offering pathways toward higher planetary MPLI amid 2025–2040 polycrisis.

In the framework, the transition is not toward a new hegemon but toward resonant pluralism—a dynamic equilibrium of synchronized yet autonomous oscillators. Russia desynchronizes rigid structures, China harmonizes material flows, India adds epistemic breadth, and BRICS+ as a whole experiments with coherence engineering. The outcome hinges on whether non-stationary shocks (AI recursion, climate tipping points, epistemological ruptures) drive re-anchoring into multipolar coherence or further decoherence.

This resonant lens reveals that geopolitics is no longer a game of domination or balance but an emergent property of multiscale phase dynamics. In embracing fractal depth and thin resonance, humanity may yet navigate the Anthropocene toward adaptive, coherent planetary order.

Reference List

Konstapel, J. (Hans). (2026, January 23). Building Coherent Geopolitics from the Quantum Vacuum. Constable Blog. https://constable.blog/2026/01/23/building-coherent-geopolitics-from-the-quantum-vacuum/
Konstapel, J. (Hans). (2025, March 30). Ruslands Geopolitieke Ambities en Spirituele Identiteit [Is Russia the Bridge Between East and West?]. Constable Blog. https://constable.blog/2025/03/30/is-rusland-de-brug-tussen-oost-en-west/
Konstapel, J. (Hans). (2026). Geopolitical Shifts: Analyzing Post-1945 Order Erosion. Constable Blog. https://constable.blog/2026/01/22/geopolitical-shifts-analyzing-post-1945-order-erosion
Konstapel, J. (Hans). (n.d.). Structural Decoherence and the Re-anchoring of Global Order: A Multi-Scale Resonant Analysis of Geopolitics toward 2050 [PDF]. Constable Blog. https://constable.blog/wp-content/uploads/Geopolitieke-Analyse_-Multipolariteit-en-Resonantie.pdf
Konstapel, J. (Hans). (2026, January 22). Coherent Geopolitics. Constable Blog. https://constable.blog/2026/01/22/coherent-geopolitics
Hui, Yuk. (Various works referenced implicitly in Konstapel’s cosmotechnics discussions).

Nederlandse uitleg

Coherent Geopolitics: Een nieuwe manier om de wereldpolitiek te begrijpen – van quantum-trillingen tot globale samenwerking

Samenvatting In een tijd van klimaatverandering, kunstmatige intelligentie, groeiende verschillen in wereldbeelden en het afbrokkelen van de oude wereldorde na 1945, schieten traditionele verklaringen voor internationale politiek vaak tekort. Realisme (machtsstrijd), liberalisme (samenwerking via instituties) en constructivisme (strijd om identiteiten) gaan uit van min of meer stabiele systemen. Hans Konstapel stelt in zijn werk een alternatief voor: Coherent Geopolitics. Hierin wordt de wereldpolitiek gezien als een groot, trillend systeem van gekoppelde oscillatoren – van het allerkleinste quantum-niveau tot hele continenten. De sleutel tot stabiliteit en aanpassingsvermogen ligt niet in dominantie of evenwicht, maar in resonantie (synchronisatie) zonder dat iedereen hetzelfde hoeft te worden. Dit artikel legt het model stap voor stap uit, met voorbeelden uit de praktijk.

1. De basis: de wereld als een symfonie van trillingen Stel je voor dat alles in het universum trilt – net als snaren op een gitaar of mensen die in een menigte beginnen mee te klappen. In de quantummechanica (de natuurkunde van het allerkleinste) bestaan zelfs lege ruimtes niet echt ‘leeg’: er is een quantum vacuum vol trillingen en fluctuaties die al in een bepaalde harmonie staan. Konstapel gebruikt dit als metafoor voor de hele realiteit: alles is beweging, en orde ontstaat wanneer trillingen op verschillende schalen in fase raken (phase-locking).

Wanneer twee pendels naast elkaar hangen en lichtjes verbonden zijn (bijv. via een veertje), beginnen ze vanzelf in hetzelfde ritme te bewegen. Dat heet synchronisatie. Konstapel zegt: precies zo werkt de wereldpolitiek. Landen, allianties en culturen zijn als grote pendels (oscillatoren). Wanneer ze goed synchroniseren over verschillende niveaus – van economie tot waarden tot milieu – ontstaat stabiliteit en veerkracht. Wanneer ze uit fase raken (decoherentie), ontstaan conflicten, instabiliteit en crises.

2. De belangrijkste begrippen uitgelegd

Fractal depth (fractale diepte): Net als een boomtak die op kleinere schaal weer op een boom lijkt, heeft een goed systeem diepe, unieke specialisaties die op meerdere niveaus terugkomen. Rusland heeft bijvoorbeeld een diepe laag van spirituele gemeenschapszin (sobornost) en aanpassingsvermogen aan tegenspoed (historisch door Mongolen, sancties). China heeft diepte in productie, infrastructuur en harmonieuze filosofie (Confucianisme + Daoïsme). Goede diepte maakt een systeem moeilijk te kopiëren of kapot te maken.
Multiscale Phase-Locking Index (MPLI): Een soort ‘gezondheids-score’ voor systemen. Het meet hoe goed trillingen op verschillende schalen (lokaal → nationaal → globaal) op elkaar aansluiten. Drie onderdelen:
- Cross-scale synchronization (CSS): Koppelen van leger, economie, cultuur en milieu.
- Environmental feedback integration (EFI): Hoe goed luistert het systeem naar de planeet (klimaat, grondstoffen)?
- Epistemic coherence (EC): Hoe consistent en overtuigend is het wereldbeeld? Hoge MPLI = veerkrachtig, innovatief, minder oorlog. Lage MPLI = broos, conflicten.
Resonant pluralism (resonant pluralisme): De ideale uitkomst. Niet één land of ideologie domineert (oude hegemonie), niet pure chaos (anarchie), maar een wereld waarin elk deel zijn eigen unieke ‘ritme’ behoudt (fractale autonomie), terwijl er lichte verbindingen zijn (thin-resonantie protocollen) voor samenwerking. Denk aan een orkest: iedereen speelt zijn eigen instrument, maar ze volgen een gemeenschappelijke maat.

3. Hoe ziet dit eruit bij grote spelers? (voorbeelden 2026)

Rusland: Een oscillator met hoge fractale diepte in spirituele en anti-hegemonische lagen (Orthodoxie, ‘Derde Rome’, lijden als groei). Het desynchroniseert de oude westerse orde (uitdaging via energie, leger, narratief) en fungeert als brug tussen Oost en West. MPLI hoog op ideologie en aanpassing, lager op technologie.
China: Zeer hoge MPLI door recursieve productie, renewables-leiderschap en harmonieuze filosofie (wu-wei: niet forceren). Het synchroniseert materiële flows (Belt and Road, parallelle betalingssystemen) zonder alles te overheersen.
Verenigde Staten & Europese Unie: Vroeger dominante attractoren, nu in decoherentie door interne polarisatie, fossiele afhankelijkheid en epistemische uniformiteit die botst met diversiteit. Lage MPLI leidt tot brittleness (gevoeligheid voor schokken).
India: Balancer met demografische en culturele diepte, voegt epistemische diversiteit toe aan het niet-westerse blok.
BRICS+: Een levend laboratorium voor resonant pluralism. Landen behouden hun specialisaties, bouwen lichte verbindingen (de-dollarisering, gezamenlijke bank, veiligheidscoördinatie) → potentieel hogere collectieve MPLI.

4. Waarom dit model ertoe doet in de huidige wereld We leven in het Anthropoceen: alles beweegt sneller en onvoorspelbaarder (klimaat, AI, nieuwe wereldbeelden). Traditionele modellen zien de wereld als een schaakbord met vaste stukken. Konstapel ziet het als een levend, trillend ecosysteem.

Voordelen:

Het verklaart waarom sancties Rusland niet breken (hoge interne coherentie).
Waarom China zo snel opschaalt (uitstekende synchronisatie over schalen).
Waarom het Westen worstelt met interne verdeeldheid en klimaatuitdagingen (decoherentie).
Het biedt hoop: in plaats van nieuwe dominantie, kan resonant pluralism een stabielere, adaptievere wereld creëren.

5. Slot: een uitnodiging tot verder denken Coherent Geopolitics is nog een opkomende theorie (nascent theory), geïnspireerd op natuurkunde (quantum, oscillatoren), biologie (synchronisatie in cellen), filosofie (cosmotechnics) en systeemdenken. Het is geen kant-en-klaar recept, maar een lens om beter te begrijpen waarom sommige systemen overleven en groeien terwijl andere afbrokkelen.

Voor niet-experts biedt het een hoopvolle boodschap: de toekomst hoeft geen winnaar-nemer te zijn. Door respect voor verschillen (fractale diepte) én lichte verbindingen (resonantie) kan de wereld coherenter en veerkrachtiger worden – juist nu we dat het hardst nodig hebben.

Referenties

Konstapel, J. (Hans). (2026). Building Coherent Geopolitics from the Quantum Vacuum. Constable Blog.
Konstapel, J. (Hans). (2026). Coherent Geopolitics: A Theory of Resonant World Order in the Anthropocene [PDF]. Constable Blog.
Konstapel, J. (Hans). (2025). Ruslands Geopolitieke Ambities en Spirituele Identiteit. Constable Blog.
Gerelateerde inspiratiebronnen (impliciet): Kuramoto (synchronisatie), Yuk Hui (cosmotechnics), Michael Levin (multiscale agency), Holling (panarchy).

Summary

Building Coherent Geopolitics from the Quantum Vacuum

Comprehensive English Summary, Chapter Structure & Annotated References

Author: Hans Konstapel
Date: 23 January 2026
Source: https://constable.blog/2026/01/23/building-coherent-geopolitics-from-the-quantum-vacuum/

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Coherent Geopolitics proposes a radical reconceptualization of global order as an emergent property of multiscale phase-locking dynamics, rooted in nilpotent quantum mechanics and oscillatory cognition. Rather than treating international relations as contests of power, institutionalism, or identity construction, the framework models global actors as coupled oscillators synchronizing across quantum, biological, neural, cognitive, cultural, institutional, and planetary scales. Geopolitical stability emerges from coherence-depth (measured via Multiscale Phase-Locking Indices—MPLI) and resolves contemporary polycrisis through resonant pluralism: a multipolar configuration preserving fractal autonomy while maintaining thin resonance protocols for coordination without assimilation or domination.

DETAILED CHAPTER STRUCTURE

Chapter 1: Ontological Foundations from the Quantum Vacuum

Core Argument: The universe does not begin with isolated particles or fields, but with coherence—specifically, nilpotent algebraic structures ensuring that fermion states and vacuum environments form mirror images. Any change in one induces symmetry-preserving adjustments in the other.

Key Concepts:

Nilpotent quantum mechanics as ontological ground
Resonant phase ontology (coupled oscillators in vacuum generating stable modes)
Vacuum-level synchronization as template for all higher scales
Weak interactions generating emergent structures without central control (Huygens’ clock analogy)

Significance: Establishes that phase-locking, not material particles, is the primitive reality underlying order at all scales.

Chapter 2: From Vacuum to Biology and Neural Coherence—Prototypical Layers

Core Argument: Biological systems instantiate vacuum-level coherence at macroscopic scale through cellular entrainment, biofield dynamics, and morphic resonance.

Key Concepts:

Biofield coherence via biophotons and calcium waves
Neural oscillations (Φ11 layer): gamma (30–100 Hz) for local binding, theta (4–8 Hz) for temporal integration
Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) enabling phase-amplitude modulation
Motor-control models of consciousness: probe–feedback–adjustment loops maintain coherence
Pathologies (rigidity, ataxia) as failures of phase-locking
Isomorphic probe-feedback-adjustment loops across scales

Significance: Shows biological embodiment of quantum principles; neural phase-locking failures mirror geopolitical fragmentation.

Chapter 3: Cognitive-Cultural Oscillatory Layers (Φ11–Φ15)—Bridging Individual to Collective

Core Argument: Five hierarchical layers translate neural coherence into cultural, institutional, and planetary synchronization.

Layer Breakdown:

Layer	Description	Function
Φ11 (Neural)	Spike-timing dependent plasticity; critical avalanches	Baseline phase-locking foundation
Φ12 (Language)	Nested delta-theta-beta-gamma oscillations; prosodic synchrony	Interpersonal brain-to-brain coupling; hierarchical entrainment
Φ13 (Symbolic)	Recurrent attractors; semantic compactification via coupled phase dynamics	Stable meaning-basins; symbolic drift modeled as phase slippage
Φ14 (Environmental Modification)	Tools and urban morphogenesis; cities as fractal attractors; superlinear innovation (β ≈ 1.15)	Extended phase space; technological recursion
Φ15 (Ecological)	Co-resonance with planetary rhythms; Lotka-Volterra with oscillatory forcing; Gaia metabolic oscillators	Biospheric alignment; adaptation to planetary cycles

Cross-Layer Integration:

Cumulative coherence: γ_total = ∏ γᵢ^αᵢ
Inter-layer phase-locking values (PLV) build hierarchical coherence
Enables epistemic pluralism as alternative rhythmic stabilizations (non-Western knowledge systems as valid oscillatory modes)

Significance: Extends quantum coherence through biological, cognitive, and cultural domains; legitimizes epistemic diversity as coherence expressions.

Chapter 4: Institutional and Planetary Scales—Emergence of Geopolitical Order

Core Argument: Institutional cycles (budgetary, electoral, infrastructural) operate as nested oscillators requiring multiscale coordination. Geopolitical order emerges from synchronization strength across all scales.

Key Metrics:

Cross-Scale Synchronization (CSS): Coupling strength between institutional, economic, military, and environmental feedback loops
Environmental Feedback Integration (EFI): Alignment with planetary boundaries (climate, biodiversity, nutrient flows)
Epistemic Coherence (EC): Narrative-experience alignment amid pluralism (consistency between stated values and actual behavior)
Multiscale Phase-Locking Index (MPLI): Composite measure combining CSS + EFI + EC

Core Proposition: MPLI outperforms traditional metrics (capability balances, institutional density, realist power indicators) in predicting:

Adaptability to non-stationarity
Long-term resilience
Conflict de-escalation
Innovation diffusion rates

Anthropocene Decoherence: Weaponized interdependence, epistemic pluralism, and technological recursion signal phase-slipping across scales, producing:

Brittleness and vulnerability to cascading failures
Zero-sum competitive binaries
Erosion of cross-scale coordination

Significance: Provides falsifiable framework linking deep physical principles (phase-locking) to observable geopolitical outcomes.

Chapter 5: Resonant Pluralism and TRIZ Resolutions

Core Argument: Viable futures avoid hegemonic succession (new hegemon replacing old) by embracing resonant pluralism: fractal specialization + thin resonance protocols.

Resonant Pluralism Definition:

Each major power/region preserves distinctive coherence specializations (fractal depth)
Maintains non-assimilative, thin resonance protocols for cross-scale coordination
Prevents domination while ensuring necessary coordination
Resolves nine key geopolitical contradictions via TRIZ inventive principles

TRIZ Integration:

Maps traditional oppositions (sovereignty vs. global coordination, autonomy vs. integration, tradition vs. innovation) as dynamic attractors
Inventive principles transform contradictions into complementary synchronization modes
Example: centralization vs. decentralization → oscillatory governance cycles

Empirical Proxies for Testing:

Ecosystem health indices
Conflict de-escalation rates
Cross-scale innovation diffusion
Higher MPLI systems (pilot audits in EU/BRICS+ labs) should exhibit superior resilience

Significance: Offers concrete governance alternative to both unipolar hegemony and multipolar power-balancing; makes theory falsifiable.

Chapter 6: Toward a Resonant World Order—Conclusion and Implications

Core Argument: Coherent Geopolitics builds a unified oscillatory paradigm spanning quantum vacuum to planetary governance, offering falsifiable, multiscale lens for Anthropocene governance.

Key Takeaways:

From Domination to Synchronization: Geopolitics transitions from zero-sum competition to emergent order via coherence engineering—aligning human systems with deeper resonant principles.
Fractal Autonomy + Thin Resonance: Viable multipolar order preserves distinctive cultural, epistemic, and economic specializations while maintaining lightweight coordination protocols (de-dollarization, parallel payment systems, non-assimilative trade).
Falsifiable Framework: Theory’s strength lies in predictive precision: measured phase-locking correlates should demonstrate superior:
- Adaptability to polycrisis (climate instability, AI recursion, epistemological ruptures)
- Ecosystem health and conflict de-escalation
- Innovation resilience across scales
Moral Imperative: Coherence engineering becomes ethical obligation—navigating non-stationarity through synchronization rather than domination yields sustainable pluralistic flourishing.

2025–2040 Transition Dynamics:

Polycrisis forces re-anchoring into multipolar coherence or further decoherence
BRICS+ emerges as empirical laboratory for resonant pluralism
Western alliance decoheres through phase-slipping (polarization, epistemic brittleness, fossil-fuel lock-in)
Russia, China, India catalyze desynchronization of old order and re-synchronization into harmonic plurality

ANNOTATED REFERENCE LIST

Primary Theoretical Foundations

Rowlands, P., & Marcer, P. (various)

Works on Nilpotent Quantum Mechanics and Dual-Space Foundations
Relevance: Core mathematical framework supporting vacuum coherence ontology and fermion-vacuum duality. Critical for establishing nilpotent algebraic ground of phase-locking.
Annotation: Provides rigorous mathematical basis for quantum vacuum as coherence source; foundational to theory’s physics legitimacy.

Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014)

“Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the ‘Orch OR’ Theory.” Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78.
Relevance: Orchestrated Objective Reduction model linking microtubule quantum coherence to consciousness; supports biological coherence thesis and phase-locking in neural systems.
Annotation: Bridges quantum phenomena and biological consciousness; establishes precedent for quantum-to-macro coherence scaling.

Neurobiology and Neural Oscillation

Buzsáki, G. (2006)

Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford University Press.
Relevance: Foundational text on neural rhythms and their functional role in cognition; directly supports Φ11 and CFC mechanisms.
Annotation: Essential reference for understanding gamma-theta-delta oscillatory hierarchy; core to neural layer formulation.

Hasson, U., et al. (2012)

“Brain-to-Brain Coupling: A Mechanism for Creating and Sharing a Social World.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121.
Relevance: Empirical evidence for interpersonal neural synchronization via language and shared experience; supports Φ12 (language layer) coherence mechanism.
Annotation: Demonstrates that coherence scales from individual to dyadic to group levels; critical for social/collective coherence thesis.

Beggs, J. M., & Plenz, D. (2003)

“Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits.” Journal of Neuroscience, 23(35), 11167–11177.
Relevance: Critical avalanche dynamics in neural systems; supports notion of phase transitions and self-organized criticality.
Annotation: Provides empirical foundation for understanding neural phase-transitions and cascading synchronization failures.

Anastassiou, C. A., et al. (2011)

“Ephaptic Coupling of Cortical Neurons.” Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 217–223.
Relevance: Ephaptic (electromagnetic field-mediated) coupling as mechanism for neural synchronization beyond synaptic transmission.
Annotation: Suggests electromagnetic coherence underlies neural phase-locking; supports broader oscillatory framework.

Bassett, D. S., & Sporns, O. (2017)

“Network Neuroscience.” Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 353–364.
Relevance: Network architecture as determinant of neural coherence and functional integration.
Annotation: Supports multiscale network perspective essential to MPLI framework.

Consciousness and Motor Control

Cotterill, R. (1998)

Enchanted Looms: Conscious Networks as the Bridge Between Matter and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Relevance: Motor-control model of consciousness emphasizing probe–feedback–adjustment loops; foundational to oscillatory consciousness framework.
Annotation: Establishes consciousness as emergent from movement dynamics; core to theory’s embodied cognition basis.

Keppler, J. (2012)

[Relevant Works on Consciousness and Phase-Locking]
Relevance: Electromagnetic models of consciousness and phase-coherence.
Annotation: Provides alternative framework linking electromagnetic field coherence to consciousness; complements Hameroff-Penrose approach.

Systems Theory and Complexity

Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002)

Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press.
Relevance: Framework for understanding nested adaptive cycles and hierarchical cross-scale interactions; precursor to MPLI multiscale approach.
Annotation: Establishes vocabulary and conceptual apparatus for hierarchical systems resilience; key to understanding geopolitical panarchy.

DeLanda, M. (2016)

Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press.
Relevance: Non-hierarchical emergence and material distribution; supports fractal-depth autonomy within resonant pluralism.
Annotation: Philosophical grounding for understanding how complex order emerges without central control or unified ontology.

Geopolitics and International Relations (Traditional Baseline)

Waltz, K. N. (1979)

Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.
Relevance: Neorealist baseline against which Coherent Geopolitics defines itself; assumes anarchic state system and power balancing.
Annotation: Represents traditional statist paradigm now rendered obsolete by technological recursion, epistemic pluralism, and planetary boundaries.

Keohane, R. O. (1984)

After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
Relevance: Liberal institutionalist framework emphasizing institutional density; counterpoint to realist power-balancing.
Annotation: Coherent Geopolitics transcends both realism and liberalism by grounding order in phase-locking rather than power or institutions.

Wendt, A. (1999)

Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Relevance: Constructivist framework treating identities and interests as socially constituted.
Annotation: Coherent Geopolitics absorbs constructivism’s epistemic pluralism into oscillatory coherence model; expands beyond discourse to include material/energetic dimensions.

Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J. (1980)

The War Ledger. University of Chicago Press.
Relevance: Power transition theory predicting conflict during hegemonic transitions.
Annotation: Coherent Geopolitics reframes power transition as phase-transition; offers alternatives to conflict-driven succession via resonant pluralism.

Contemporary Geopolitical Analysis

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019)

“Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion.” International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
Relevance: Documents decoherence mechanisms (sanctions, technology decoupling, epistemic fragmentation) producing geopolitical brittleness.
Annotation: Empirical evidence for phase-slipping across economic, technological, and epistemic layers; validates MPLI diagnostic.

Planetary Boundaries and Earth System Governance

Rockström, J., et al. (2009)

“A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.
Relevance: Establishes planetary boundaries as objective constraints on human systems; core to EFI (Environmental Feedback Integration) metric.
Annotation: Operationalizes Φ15 (ecological layer) coherence requirements; makes climate/biodiversity constraints measurable.

Steffen, W., et al. (2015)

“Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
Relevance: Updated planetary boundaries framework incorporating climate, biodiversity, nutrient cycles, and chemical pollution.
Annotation: Expands EFI measurement toolkit; operationalizes multiscale feedback integration.

Schellnhuber, H. J. (2015)

“Why the Right Climate Target Was Agreed in Paris.” Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 649–653.
Relevance: Analysis of Paris Agreement as attempt at cross-scale synchronization for climate governance.
Annotation: Documents institutional inadequacy of traditional coordination mechanisms; demonstrates need for coherence engineering.

Gaia Hypothesis and Planetary Rhythms

Lovelock, J. E., & Margulis, L. (1974)

“Atmospheric Homeostasis by and for the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis.” Tellus, 26(1–2), 2–10.
Relevance: Foundational framework for understanding planetary system as self-regulating oscillator; supports Φ15 (ecological) layer.
Annotation: Conceptual precedent for treating Earth as coherent coupled-oscillator system; legitimizes planetary-scale phase-locking notion.

Urban Scaling and Cities as Fractal Attractors

Bettencourt, L. M., & West, G. B. (2010)

“Urban Scaling and Sustainability.” Sustainability, 2(9), 2859–2880.
Relevance: Mathematical scaling laws in cities (superlinear innovation β ≈ 1.15); supports Φ14 (environmental modification) fractal properties.
Annotation: Demonstrates that cities exhibit fractal phase-space expansion; urban coherence measurable via scaling exponents.

Pluriverse and Epistemic Pluralism

Escobar, A. (2018)

Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.
Relevance: Theoretical grounding for epistemic pluralism and the right of diverse peoples to pursue alternative modernities.
Annotation: Philosophical foundation for Φ13–Φ15 as enabling alternative knowledge systems; supports resonant pluralism’s legitimacy principle.

Contemporary Surveillance and Non-Human Agency

Zuboff, S. (2024)

[Relevant Works on Surveillance Capitalism and Non-Human Agency]
Relevance: Analysis of AI and algorithmic systems as agents reshaping human coherence; relevant to Φ14 (technological recursion) and polycrisis decoherence.
Annotation: Documents how unaligned AI systems introduce decoherence into institutional/cultural layers; motivates coherence engineering as countermeasure.

CONCEPTUAL DIAGRAM: THE RESONANT CASCADE

Quantum Vacuum (Nilpotent Coherence)
          ↓
    Biological Coherence (Biophotons, Morphic Resonance)
          ↓
    Neural Oscillations (Φ11: Gamma–Theta–Delta)
          ↓
    Language & Prosody (Φ12: Interpersonal Synchrony)
          ↓
    Symbolic Meaning (Φ13: Semantic Attractors)
          ↓
    Environmental Modification (Φ14: Tools, Cities, Tech)
          ↓
    Ecological Co-Resonance (Φ15: Biospheric Cycles)
          ↓
    Institutional Order (Governance Cycles)
          ↓
    Geopolitical Coherence (MPLI-Measured Stability)
          ↓
    Resonant Pluralism or Decoherent Brittleness

METHODOLOGY FOR TESTING COHERENT GEOPOLITICS

Measure MPLI (CSS + EFI + EC) for major powers/alliances (2024–2030)
Correlate with outcomes: adaptability scores, conflict escalation/de-escalation, innovation diffusion rates
Pilot audits: EU vs. BRICS+ coherence engineering experiments
Falsification threshold: If high-MPLI systems do not outperform low-MPLI on resilience metrics by 2030, framework requires revision

KEY INSIGHTS FOR PRACTITIONERS

Why BRICS+ outperforms Western alliances: Superior cross-scale synchronization (energy, finance, epistemic systems aligned without enforced uniformity)
Why Russia persists under sanctions: High fractal depth and epistemic coherence; internal oscillatory stability resists external decoherence attempts
Why China integrates faster: Harmonic philosophy (wu-wei) enables natural resonance across production, ecology, social systems without friction-inducing centralized control
Why the West experiences brittleness: Decoherence from polarization, fossil-fuel lock-in, epistemic uniformity masking as universalism, and inability to absorb Global South epistemologies

CRITICAL EVALUATION & OPEN QUESTIONS

Strengths:

Novel bridging of quantum physics, neurobiology, and geopolitics
Falsifiable predictions (MPLI correlates with outcomes)
Integrates pluralism without relativism (coherence provides objective metric)
Offers ethical alternative to hegemony/dominance

Weaknesses/Open Questions:

Mathematical formalization of MPLI still emerging; empirical measurement protocols require development
Assumes universality of oscillatory principles across scales; may require domain-specific adaptations
TRIZ integration preliminary; needs concrete case studies
Requires unprecedented cross-disciplinary collaboration for validation

Document Compiled: January 24, 2026
Status: Working theoretical framework; pilot validation phase